The anniversary was marked by remonstrations on both side––the M23 President Bertrand Bisimwa accused Kinshasa of not upholding its side of the deal, while Kinshasa complained that the M23 had not participated in follow-up meetings in Kinshasa and Nairobi in recent weeks, and said "one has the impression that they aren't ready" to come back.
M23 President Bertrand Bisimwa (left) and General Sultani Makenga in Bunagana (© Jason Stearns) |
Under pressure by the international community to conclude a peace deal to facilitate the return of those combatants, a compromise was reached on 12 December 2013 in Nairobi. Parallel declarations were signed by both parties, committing the M23 to a peaceful return, demobilization and conversion into a political party, while the government promised a conditional amnesty, demobilization program, and national reconciliation.
That was almost a year ago. Some modest progress has been made: the Congolese government promulgated a new amnesty law in February 2014 and has issued five successive lists of amnesties, totaling 288 M23 members (most of their names can be found here) out of a reported total of over 2,100 requests for amnesty. A new demobilization commission was created on paper in December 2013 (its structure and budget has since been changed), although funding ($84 million) is still pending and there have been reports of over a hundred dead in the newly established DDR camps.
But that progress is extremely limited: most of the M23 soldiers are still abroad, and the Congolese government will not amnesty the majority of M23 military commanders, whom it considers war criminals. The Rwandan and Ugandan governments, for their part, are unlikely to arrest and extradite leaders of a group that they supported.
In the meantime, many of the M23 in the camps appear to have auto-demobilized, tiring of life in the camps and returning home to the Congo or Rwanda (many were recruited from Congolese refugee camps there, or were Rwandans). According to diplomats who visited the Ngoma camp in Rwanda, around half of the soldiers may have left since last year; a similar trend has been observed in Uganda.
However, over the past three months, there have also been increasing reports that the M23 may be remobilizing in preparation of a new attack. Several attempts have been made to reconcile the Bosco and Makenga wings, Ugandan authorities have told the M23 housed in their camps that they want them gone by the end of the year, and numerous M23 members have told friends and family that an operation is being prepared. According to a soldier in the Bihanga military camp in Uganda, Makenga reportedly gave a speech to M23 soldiers there recently, saying that "soldiers should be ready for an operation." A civilian leader of the M23 told me, "they will attack before the end of the month, that was the plan." Even their civilian leader Bertrand Bisimwa says that if Kinshasa doesn't live up to its side of the Nairobi Declaration, he cannot "give guarantees for what will happen tomorrow."
Few details about the nature of these operations are clear. Several sources suggest that there could be a group that will go through South Sudan into Ituri––the M23 had tried mobilizing there in 2012 and failed, but some of the officers formerly based in Ituri are now in Rwanda and still have contacts there. Another M23 leader suggests that they will carry out operations in the Kasindi area of North Kivu––M23 commanders from the Nande community, such as Colonel Nyoro Kasereka, currently in Rwanda, are from that area. There have also been reports of M23 mobilization in Masisi territory in recent months, documented by human rights workers.
Given the weakness of the M23, it would be difficult to mount a large-scale attack without substantial backing from the Rwandan or Ugandan governments, which would risk triggering another wave of international opprobrium. It is more likely that they would try to destabilize the Congolese government and shame its army and the United Nations with small, sporadic attacks, possibly under the guise of other armed groups, compounding the already fragile security situation. "I think they are biding their time for a political crisis, possibly linked to the elections or a constitutional revision," one M23 member said.
RE: "It is more likely that they would try to destabilize the Congolese government and shame its army and the United Nations with small, sporadic attacks, possibly under the guise of other armed groups, compounding the already fragile security situation."
ReplyDeleteIsn't it possible that that is what the reported return of the ADF is? Aljazeera reports that they have been unable to make contact or otherwise confirm that the militia which has most recently killed Congolese villagers in Beni are indeed ADF fighters, and the return of the ADF, after many years of inactivity, always seemed implausible. Other sources report that information about these fighters is very sketchy.
Perhaps, although that's not what most of my sources suggest. I would caution against any quick conclusions here––the ADF does exist, it has been very active in the region recently and is often very brutal. There are a lot of contradictory hypotheses about who carried out the massacres and why, and I don't think all the facts are in, yet.
ReplyDelete@Ann Garrison, I completely agree with you on the ADF situation.most of this recent attacks look more like a work of some local former warlords with ties to the UPDF or RDF .i will agree with Jason .yes maybe the so called ADF does exist but if they are oparating very close to the UGANDAN boarder and always escape to The Ugandan side after avery attack,we will also be seing similar low level attacks within Uganda since they supposedly have the capacity to operate within both the DRC and Ugandan areas.
ReplyDelete_If this is an Islamic movement with links to Alshebab ...Fighting to establish an Islamic State in Uganda, why will they spend Years attacking Congoleles villagers instead of attacking Ugandan institutions?like all other Islamic terror movements i will expect this guys to be llaunching big or small scale terror attacks against Ugandan institutions and use it for propaganda and recruitment like all other Islamist terror movements and their leaders arested and paraded on Ugandan state TV ...But all we see is some congolese villagers being murdered buy a group called ADF.until we start seing attacks inside uganda and someone claiming responsability for them and not just a gost ,i will continue to daout the existence of this group.
I completely agree with Jason on the M23 analysis. I don't think the M23 has the capacity of regrouping and mounting large-scale attacks without the backing of Rwanda or Uganda. Even with the backing of Rwanda they'll don't have the capacity of confronting the FARC and their allies .But until we see regime change mostly in RWANDA, we will continue to see attempt by the KAGAME junta to destabilise the region. after 2 decades regime changes are long overdue in this region. First in Rwanda ,followed by Uganda and the DRC. We can't have the same prayers playing the same games over and over again and expect a different result.
ReplyDelete